tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post4159134883260317654..comments2024-03-24T02:32:42.657-05:00Comments on music ruined my life: Reality Wins!jeffenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comBlogger47125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-67984915774686235892012-11-17T13:31:30.521-06:002012-11-17T13:31:30.521-06:00This might be another reason why Romney didn't...This might be another reason why Romney didn't want to release his tax returns:<br />http://tinyurl.com/d74xrakJerry Leehttp://www.jerryleelewis.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-44749949200039113372012-11-17T13:24:12.557-06:002012-11-17T13:24:12.557-06:001) I don't think there's much of a differe...1) I don't think there's much of a difference. The Republicans may have found stronger, better candidates if they didn't take such a hard turn to the far right. Two strong parties make for better choices for the voters. What if these "very, very weak candidates" had actually been elected? That wouldn't help the country.<br /><br />2) I have no doubt the Democrats are doing some of the same things, but not to the extent and longevity as Karl Rove. Political dirty tricks and smear campaigns are his speciality. It wouldn't surprise me one bit to learn that he was involved in the voter ID scam, it reeks of his influence. Have you seen the movie or read the book "Bush's Brain"? He's been doing this for years, and here's a possible reason why the Republicans were so surprised when Obama won Ohio:<br />http://tinyurl.com/9m7d2ze<br /><br />Deceitful and despicable are very accurate for Karl Rove; "miserable bastard" is probably a better description of Donald Trump. Just Google "Karl Rove's lies" and "Karl Rove's smear campaigns" for more info.Jerry Leehttp://www.jerryleelewis.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-81806151670874122602012-11-16T21:11:43.069-06:002012-11-16T21:11:43.069-06:00B) 'George W. Bush did not like being confront...B) 'George W. Bush did not like being confrontational.'<br /><br /><br />What?<br /><br /><br />*Sputter*<br /><br /><br />George 'Bring It On' Bush knew all about confrontational but you're claiming he was a wimp is the weirdest right-wing revisionism I've hear this year.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-35713425185759829792012-11-16T21:08:39.455-06:002012-11-16T21:08:39.455-06:00A) 'The financial collapse was caused by Congr...A) 'The financial collapse was caused by Congress, under the leadership of House Finance Committee Chair Barney Frank'<br /><br />A right-wing talking point with little to no basis in reality:<br /><br />http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/aug/06/financial-crisis-25-people-heart-meltdown<br /><br /><br />It's not tht the Dem's are blameless in this affair but it amazing when President Clinton created a surplus you claim it's Republicans who did it and when President Bush created a deficit, you claim it's Democrats who did it.<br />Remind me, where does the buck stop again?jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-9510632592359775402012-11-16T21:03:01.381-06:002012-11-16T21:03:01.381-06:001. Cutting the capital gains tax created the surpl...1. Cutting the capital gains tax created the surplus.<br />I can't tell you exactly what created the surplus but I am sure that it was not that alone.<br /><br />2. " Even Republicans liked Clinton personally"<br />THEY TRIED TO IMPEACH HIM!<br />OVER A BLOW JOB!!<br />Again this historical dishonesty the right are engaged in to cover up their shameful behaviour during the Clinton era is execrable.<br /><br />If impeachment is what you get for co-operation perhaps Obama's distance from the Republicans is smarter than I thought.jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-79237069542572997182012-11-16T20:49:22.216-06:002012-11-16T20:49:22.216-06:00"They begged and demanded and cajoled for tho..."They begged and demanded and cajoled for those returns. And what did they find when they were finally released? "<br />You NEED to broaden your reading base. <br />THE TAX RETURNS WERE NEVER RELEASED.<br />http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/09/21/did-mitt-romney-release-enough-of-his-tax-returns<br />Of course he gave millions, it's a requirement of his church, what he was hiding was his tax rate and his off-shore holdings et al. (Both he and Anne was pretty forthcoming on THAT front in interviews:<br /><br />http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/romney-to-release-2011-tax-returns/<br /><br /><br /><br />I agree we need to work together but until The Republican Party (NOT to be confused with people who hold conservative views) is willing to update its views, as the Democrats did in the 1990's, I fear compromise will be difficult.jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-75474241893224613652012-11-16T20:19:34.431-06:002012-11-16T20:19:34.431-06:00Someone pointed out that this reply seemed bellige...Someone pointed out that this reply seemed belligerent and perhaps they're right.<br /><br />This admission should not be confused with my believing that the original statement has any merit.<br /><br />jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-47024008228144868962012-11-16T20:15:03.465-06:002012-11-16T20:15:03.465-06:00Look arguing against vitriol is pretty fair but th...Look arguing against vitriol is pretty fair but that said Karl Rove (and his mentor Lee Atwater) have turned too many Americans against each other to benefit their political to be left alone.<br /><br />If I can ask you one favour, please read this interview before claiming that modern-era Democrats and Republicans are the same when it come to campaign rhetoric.<br /><br />http://www.thenation.com/article/170841/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategyjeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-67426902804251304302012-11-16T17:22:31.261-06:002012-11-16T17:22:31.261-06:00I'm not taking what you say as a slam(and I ho...I'm not taking what you say as a slam(and I hope you are doing the same) and furthermore I hope you are not offended when I take up error I see.<br />That's the spirit of debate!<br /><br />That said I have no idea what " I cannot name any nation that ever taxed itself into prosperity" means.<br />Can this be proved or disproved? Am I missing something?<br /><br />"And treating people who work hard to be successful as if they are the enemy is self-defeating"<br />I agree.<br /> What I disagree with is that the modern-day Democratic party, who want to return tax rates to the Clinton era are doing anything remotely like that.<br />jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-89497963010123104872012-11-16T17:07:01.966-06:002012-11-16T17:07:01.966-06:00"I am also closely watching the snowballing (..."I am also closely watching the snowballing (and suppressed) reports of voter fraud that continue to come in"<br /><br />Then give this a read:<br />http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/philadelphia_voter_fraud_is_it_possible_that_barack_obama_won_100_percent.html<br /><br /><br />I think if you're a dedicated Republican these results may be shocking but if you saw that 47% tape with open eyes you should marvel that anyone would vote for the man who spoke those hateful words about them, their friends, their neighbours and their loved ones.jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-10868118338239830302012-11-16T16:54:10.810-06:002012-11-16T16:54:10.810-06:003% (and 332 EV vs. 206 EV ) is a lot less close th...3% (and 332 EV vs. 206 EV ) is a lot less close then Bush v. Kerry and Bush bragged that he 'earned political capital' and I didn't hear any Republicans disagree. So they best hold there peace now, especially after such a decisive loss.jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-77448750860301306042012-11-16T16:49:20.326-06:002012-11-16T16:49:20.326-06:00"moral equivalent of apologizing,"
NO!
..."moral equivalent of apologizing," <br />NO!<br />The lying has to stop.<br />There is no apology tour.<br />You can try to stick in weasel-words like 'moral equivalent' but they don;t change the facts, there was no apology tour. Full stop.jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-24226332927930778892012-11-16T16:46:31.931-06:002012-11-16T16:46:31.931-06:00Those few stray comments are not even CLOSE to ...Those few stray comments are not even CLOSE to 'demonizing', though I'll admit the 'fuck your phony outrage' was too over-the top.<br /><br />And as for Maria, are you even reading my replies to you or her comments for that manner????<br />She starts off by insulting me and that's the mildest of her curses in her time 'reading here'<br />Seriously, follow the link I gave you to prove my point that she is belligerent.jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-16275197170355644482012-11-16T16:39:24.486-06:002012-11-16T16:39:24.486-06:00This is gonna take awhile.
Re: Lionizing Fox News...This is gonna take awhile.<br /><br />Re: Lionizing Fox News.<br /><br />Exhibit one: " you probably mean the only media left that dares question Democrats"<br /><br />Exhibit two "They are simply the only major network that even so much as questions the liberal party line that is virtually parroted on every other network. "<br /><br />This is trying to act as if it's heroic that Fox and other such media outlets act as an arm of the Republican party (check the number of pundits who've run for the presidential nomination they have had work there over the years).<br /><br />While I'm well aware of the many sources of right-wing news on-line (NR, Hot Air, Daily Caller et al), as Fox is both best known and the most influential of these it is an acceptable short-hand for 'news that is created by and for Republicans".<br /><br />Of course Fox is a threat it roils up false controversies ("Death panels") that limits debate on the the greatest issues of the day.<br /><br />Um, I'm not sure if you're right-wing news sources showed you this but FOX news' myriad predictions that Romney would win were proved laughably false. Hell even Megan Kelly called it "math you so a s a Republican to make yourselves feel better". They, especially Karl Rove, were publicly humiliated and if you can't see that I'm not sure if you're arguing in good faith.<br /><br />http://punditshaming.tumblr.com/<br />jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-24804748317906992232012-11-15T12:09:22.638-06:002012-11-15T12:09:22.638-06:001) I would not be so quick to equate the attempt ...1) I would not be so quick to equate the attempt to weaken a political party with attempting to ruin one's country.<br /><br />2) Do you honestly believe that none of the consultants and operatives for Democrats do the same thing? Really?<br /><br />My point is simply that vilifying people for their political views or worse, making hateful statements about some of these figures is fruitless and isn't going to change anyone's mind. I have very strong feelings about Obama and many of the people who voted for him, however, I am careful not to express those feelings publicly and, when giving my opinions, I try to civilize them with a bit of restraint. I am of the minority school that believed no Obama voter was going to change his mind because of telling him he was stupid to vote for Obama or asking him if he was embarrassed yet. All that does is put people on the defensive. <br /><br />Calling someone a miserable bastard might make you feel better, but it doesn't help anyone and only inflames the positions people already hold on both sides. It doesn't tell me half as much about Rove as it does about you. I want to think that you are better than that and I think you can be. No Democrat or Republican is going to change his mind by reading or listening to vitriol.George Psoriasisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-50756183669979492842012-11-14T15:03:52.286-06:002012-11-14T15:03:52.286-06:00Karl Rove spent millions of dollars trying ro get ...Karl Rove spent millions of dollars trying ro get "very, very weak candidates" elected. Should I thank him for trying to ruin my country? Do some research and see what else he's been doing for about 20 years. That too should persuade people.Jerry Leehttp://www.jerryleelewis.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-11516062782450919262012-11-13T23:09:56.911-06:002012-11-13T23:09:56.911-06:00"That miserable bastard deserves all the mock..."That miserable bastard deserves all the mocking and derision thrown at him!"<br /><br />Nice. I'm sure you'll persuade all kinds of people using that kind of charm.George Psoriasisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-38537965389967565532012-11-13T23:04:39.238-06:002012-11-13T23:04:39.238-06:00CONTINUED
Take the latest target liberals love t...CONTINUED<br /><br /><br />Take the latest target liberals love to hate—Mitt Romney—gave away MILLIONS to charities. In fact, it’s interesting to compare his tax returns to Obama’s. They begged and demanded and cajoled for those returns. And what did they find when they were finally released? Romney donated more than 4 million to charity.<br />I know a few rich people (and yes, I hope to be one of them one day—no apologies) and it’s been my experience that most of them prefer to give and not blow their horn about it. They don’t want their name inscribed on a wall or published. Perhaps that was Romney’s reason for holding out on releasing his returns. <br /><br />I really wanted to believe that the liberal argument was irrefutable. The only problem is that the reality I face every day refutes it. Not completely. There are good arguments on some issues that the liberals hold. There are good arguments on the issues that conservatives make. They (we) need to work WITH each other.<br /><br />That’s all—for now.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-68400588004529508292012-11-13T23:04:07.271-06:002012-11-13T23:04:07.271-06:00I have been busy all day and most of this evening,...I have been busy all day and most of this evening, but returning to this “discussion”...<br /><br />Who is “lionizing” Fox News? It appears that anyone who makes a point in favor of the conservative position here is immediately labeled a Fox News junkie. There are plenty of other news outlets than Fox News. They are simply the only major network that even so much as questions the liberal party line that is virtually parroted on every other network. I wish I had the time to watch Fox News more often. Most of us get our news from the internet today and the sources are myriad. Perhaps you can specify how Fox is misleading their viewers (and I KNOW you can’t resist that one). If Fox is so inane and stupid, those who disagree with Fox sure seem to treat Fox News as a threat. If Americans so soundly reject conservatism as is suggested here, Fox News is hardly a threat, but, again, the way Fox is relentlessly criticized…<br /><br />Where I felt that you demonized people was with such intemperate remarks as the assumption that Republicans will “double down on crazy” or accusing Maria of being “unthinking” (don’t you think she might find that a bit, well, belligerent?) And who could ignore your warm, friendly, “F___K YOU”, even if it is addressed to someone’s outrage--and how could you possibly know whether it was phony or not? You might disagree with his outrage, but he may very well be feeling authentic outrage. Perhaps I should take you to task more for attempting to mind-read. <br /><br />Romney may not have had the facts straight on the Chrysler ad, but is that even HALF as egregious as Obama’s lie about Obamacare not being a tax and his deliberate behind-our-backs maneuver in the U.S. Supreme Court—arguing that it IS a tax? On one hand we have an ad about the auto industry that is at best misinformed and at worse, a misleading falsehood. On the other hand, we have the POTUS deliberately lying and proving so by having his attorneys say the exact opposite of what he pitched to us to win in court. I don’t think there’s any comparison. And Obama’s lie is one that will completely change the U.S. economy and be a part of every American’s life in the coming years.<br /><br />Obama’s apology tour was certainly not a lie. The fundamentalist Democrat may assert that he never specifically apologized, but what he did in the Middle East was the moral equivalent of apologizing, making repeated mea culpas about America to “win respect” from the Middle East. They don’t respect us one iota more now than then, as current events clearly indicate.<br /><br />Less than 3 percentage points is not even close? Really?<br /><br />I don’t feel any better about losing an election because of a narrow margin. I am simply looking at the numbers and trying to figure out what they mean. I am also closely watching the snowballing (and suppressed) reports of voter fraud that continue to come in. Go ahead and laugh if you like, but it is almost statistically impossible for any precinct to deliver 100 percent of the vote to one single candidate, yet, 59 precincts in Philadelphia did just that. At the very least, such numbers should arouse suspicion. Even Mayor Daley’s Chicago machine of generations past was not THAT effective.<br /><br />I am not attempting to slam you Mr. J. I am simply arguing what I believe is a very different set of answers to some the things you seem so certain about. Perhaps neither of us is entirely correct, but I will say again, I USED TO BE A DEMOCRAT. I left the party for a number of reasons—some which I might share later—but mostly because I became convinced that the way they operated simply did not work. I cannot name any nation that ever taxed itself into prosperity. And treating people who work hard to be successful as if they are the enemy is self-defeating. It is also extremely unfair to assume all wealthy people are completely disconnected from the rest of us.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-28799889039336212292012-11-13T06:54:29.131-06:002012-11-13T06:54:29.131-06:00I accept your apology, in the heat of debate we al...I accept your apology, in the heat of debate we all say things that come out wrong.<br /><br />However I still challenge this assertion " I simply sense a lot of anger on this page and most of the "conversation" on this page seems more focused on proving, "I'm right and you're wrong so there!" and I don't think that is productive. <br /><br />I mean have you read the comments? I get hate-filled, CAPS-LOCKED screeds even for my mildest posts (see here if you are skeptical http://musicruinedmylife.blogspot.ca/search/label/Coffin%20Break)<br />And yet I say over and over again I blame the upper reaches of The Republican Party not the people.<br /><br />And we are having a debate, sir, so I intend to say my point that I think that Republicans owe a much larger share of the blame for government dysfunction that Democrats (whose blame is more about passivity then active blundering) over the last twenty years.<br />You're welcome to assert the contrary here, with facts, but I intend to rebut every point, civilly where possible, because I believe that by reducing it to 'they're both at fault' we play into the hands of those that would harm the country strictly for profit and power.<br /><br />While I can't speak for everyone who share my views, I never said the republicans we're 'destroyed', only that they were soundly beaten in this election - and that much is factual.<br /><br />We all need a bit of humility, eh? Fair enough, I can't argue that point at all! <br /><br />jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-61522652920208146062012-11-13T06:42:36.399-06:002012-11-13T06:42:36.399-06:00Do you know nothing of Karl Rove's history? Th...Do you know nothing of Karl Rove's history? That miserable bastard deserves all the mocking and derision thrown at him! He pissed away $390 million, then claimed that Obama won because he "suppressed the vote", Hurricane Sandy "interrupted Romney's momentum", and because "we had some very, very weak candidates"! I've yet to hear the Super Bowl losers make so many excuses. <br /><br />"Show a little class"?? What about the hatred spewed at President Obama for the last three years? The birth certificate, college transcripts, he's a Muslim, he doesn't salute the flag, screaming "liar" at the State Of The Union address… The man has constantly risen above the hatred and lies. Did you not hear Obama's victory speech where he said he'd sit down with Romney and discuss America's future? <br /><br />Did you not read the dissenting comments on this blog? So much for the pot calling the kettle black.Jerry Leehttp://jerryleelewis.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-27110643195857641452012-11-13T06:25:27.631-06:002012-11-13T06:25:27.631-06:00Dear Mr. J:
I am not attempting to "slam&quo...Dear Mr. J:<br /><br />I am not attempting to "slam" you. I humbly apologize for what I thought was my sense of humor, but apparently is only offensive to you. I have chosen to remain anonymous for a number of reasons which I will keep to myself. If you choose to call me a coward, so be it. I simply sense a lot of anger on this page and most of the "conversation" on this page seems more focused on proving, "I'm right and you're wrong so there!" and I don't think that is productive. Winners in civilized societies are supposed to be gracious, not rubbing their opponents noses in their loss. I also think we need to acknowledge that we all have to get along and work together, because politics has grown decidedly nastier in the last 20 years or so. Now before you retort that "It's all the Republican's fault" all I want to say is that it doesn't have to be this way. If you cannot acknowledge that BOTH sides of the aisle have coarsened what passes for "debate" than I see no further point in commenting. If Democrats and Republicans don't stop this schoolyard stuff, it's only going to get worse. The only consistent polling I've noticed that never changes is that Americans are increasingly turned off by Washington politics. <br /><br />As a final note, I give you this observation: I have watched the Republicans AND the Democrats win huge victories with the media speculating that they had finally, somehow, "decimated" or "destroyed" their opponents for years to come--only to watch the other side come roaring back. All victory is fleeting. When either side thinks they have won "complete control" circumstances beyond their control tend to take over.<br /><br />A bit of humility would behoove us all, myself included.<br /><br />Again, I apologize for the offense I gave you. If it's any comfort, I'm still probably older than you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-5541081433883500022012-11-13T06:12:58.785-06:002012-11-13T06:12:58.785-06:00You're probably referring to Mitch McConnell.
...You're probably referring to Mitch McConnell.<br /><br />Look, I won't deny that extreme partisanship exists on BOTH SIDES of the aisle and that's a huge part of the problem. In fact, it's part of the problem on this page. We can't seem to disagree with each other without being disagreeable. Liberalism isn't going away and neither is conservatism. The smartest thing all of us could do is learn to get along with each other.<br /><br />My point is that George W. Bush and Wm. J. Clinton spent time with their opponents and developed relationships with them. Obama seems to be cut from an entire clothe entirely.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-60500491766897212372012-11-13T05:52:14.929-06:002012-11-13T05:52:14.929-06:001) Who said everyone had to agree, I'm always ...1) Who said everyone had to agree, I'm always hoping for people to have something thoughtful; to say, pro or con.<br /><br />2) You can attempt to lionize FOX but they convinced themselves and their viewers of a lie ('Romney was going to win") which give evidence of how they deliberately mislead their viewers for profit and partisan gain.<br />And this is 'to be a college professor IS to be a leftist' is crude and small-minded over-generalization.<br /><br />3) Have you read anything I wrote above? The post in question has no 'demonizing' and where I attempt to cast blame it is almost always upon the members of The Republican party or it's corporate sponsors. I did say 'fuck you phony outrage' to a commenter but my obscenities are pretty few and far between here.<br /><br />3) "honesty shortages" <br />Romney's camp said things that were factually incorrect over and over (i.e. the Chrysler charge, The Apology Tour etc.) Obama has his own sins to account but they are not in the same league.<br />Um, you're missing the fact that Republicans decided to act in lockstep despite the fact that Democrats chose a Republican idea from the 90's as they're health care model.<br /><br />"Obama has no mandate, just a slimmer margin of the popular vote than what elected him the first time--he's the only president in history to win re-election by a smaller vote margin."<br />Now this is what we call "Math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better"<br />Here you are definitely reciting a blatant Fox Talking Point.<br />No Republican cared about Bush's 'mandates' even when he LOST the popular vote the first time out!<br /><br />50.6% vs. 47.8% is not close and 332 EV vs. 206 EV is a landslide. You need to come around and deal with it.<br /><br />I love reading this attempt to slam me, knowing you're going to realize you're wrong and then, rather then admitting your error, you're just going to try to slam me another way. <br />Weak.jeffenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05015674620176399988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4191686244361274747.post-11043453714781435622012-11-13T05:48:30.857-06:002012-11-13T05:48:30.857-06:00"HE WAS WILLING TO WORK WITH THEM."
Jus..."HE WAS WILLING TO WORK WITH THEM."<br /><br />Just for the record- several Republicans stated that their only objective was to ensure Obama's defeat in 2012. Have you conveniently forgotten the propaganda campaign of lies and negativity that started almost the day of Obama's inauguration? So much for working together.<br /><br />"Even his war policies may have been expensive, but he initially had Bi-partisan support."<br /><br />The Bush/Cheney administration got their bi-partisan support by lying about "weapons of mass destruction" and Nigerian uranium shipments. <br /><br />Odd that you're the only one here mocking people's appearance and speech.Jerry Leehttp://jerryleelewis.comnoreply@blogger.com